In addition to the fact that the name “Indian Boundary” denotes a line created to ethnically cleanse the area, there is also imagery within the fieldhouse that may be triggering to many, in particular to Native Americans and Jews. We want to notify people in advance as a trigger warning, and to affirm Khecari’s anti-racist stance.
The Indian Boundary Cultural Center fieldhouse was created in the height of the 1920s whitewashing that romanticized and appropriated American Indian cultures. Ostensibly Native images and symbols abound in the building but were designed by the architect, Clarence Hatzfeld, a second generation American of German ancestry. There is no evidence that Hatzfeld’s choices of these images came from any particular knowledge of any Native cultures. We understand also that Native peoples did not choose these representations or participate in the design of the fieldhouse.
Included in this decor are symbols called whirling logs in some Native nations, which look almost identical to the Nazi hakenkreuz, more commonly referred to as swastikas. There is also no evidence that this choice came from sympathy with the Nazi movement, which had at that point been established but had not yet accrued mainstream power in Germany. We have been told that Hatzfeld included this symbols in the decor based on his assumption of Native American decorative symbology. We recognize that many people in the Western world see these markings as hakenkreuz/swastikas and not whirling logs due to the appropriation of this symbol based on the atrocities committed by the Nazis, a feeling we understand and share. We understand that this symbol has a rich and positive history for many traditions around the world, though some people have now eschewed their continued use out of solidarity with Jews, Roma, and others who suffered under the Nazis. Other people have chosen to try and reclaim the symbol from the abuse that is has suffered and return it to its sacred meanings for their cultures. The fieldhouse itself has been designated a Chicago Landmark, so the symbols are unable to be removed or altered by the park’s supervisor, staff, or resident artists. We are currently engaged in a daily practice at the beginning of each rehearsal we have at the space to engage in advocacy, spend time learning, and creating permanent/semi-permanent pieces to display in the space to give more context about the history of the land theft from the original inhabitants.
We have been asked why we work at a space that holds history and features iconography with which we clearly have issues. While we would love for there to not be this history and decor in our country, neighborhood and park, we also know that distressing histories surround us everywhere we go. There is no purity or perfection to be found. All studio spaces in Chicago occupy what had been Native lands. The current name of this park and the symbols therein give us all a chance to talk about a reality which is frequently unremembered in the day-to-day of jobs, rehearsals, and shows. In our ongoing conversations about these issues, one Native voice spoke out strongly against a name change for Indian Boundary Park, as it could risk whitewashing or sweeping under the rug the history the name points to. Another encouraged a name change to a historic local Native woman to lift her up and focus on positive and real representation. Another asked us to post the broken treaty that named the boundary. We feel like we are a part of a transformation of the space at this unique point in time and are committed to the slow, careful, and communal process of that unfolding change. Indian Boundary Cultural Center has also been an arts center vital to the Rogers Park and West Ridge communities for over a hundred years. We have lived and worked here as artists for 20 years, have been Arts Partners in Residence at Indian Boundary Cultural Center since 2012, and remain committed to the collective caretaking of what is and will remain our home and our community. Spaces supporting the arts are fairly rare, and are under threat, and are vital to our collective social and cultural health. We want to use our position of influence and privilege (however minor these in fact are) to create positive change and greater health to the space and the community it serves whether that be in communicating and listening to what the Native community would want, creating and posting language/trigger warnings/contextualization of the name and decor, or in the eventual transformation of the Cultural Center by way of name changes, decor change, and programming.
If you would like to participate in these dialogues, activism and transformations with us, please
email us if you are so inclined.